When new marketing leadership comes in, whether permanent or fractional, there is immediate pressure to produce. Boards want a plan. The CEO wants to see momentum. The team wants to know what's changing.
That pressure is understandable. It's also counterproductive when it gets in the way of asking the right questions.
The most valuable thing incoming marketing leadership can do in the first few weeks isn't to produce a plan. It's to interrogate the brief, and usually to rewrite it.
The brief you're given versus the brief you need
The brief most companies present to incoming marketing leaders is a description of symptoms, not causes. It looks like this: we need more leads, we need better brand awareness, we need to be more visible in this market. These are outcomes companies want. They are not briefs.
A real brief starts one level back: why aren't you getting the leads? What's preventing brand awareness from building? What specifically is blocking visibility in the target market?
In most cases, the symptoms point to something upstream. Demand generation isn't working because the targeting is off, and the targeting is off because nobody has clearly defined who the best customer actually is. Brand awareness isn't building because the messaging doesn't give the market a reason to remember you. Visibility is low because the company hasn't committed to a genuine point of view that the market can orientate around.
The questions that reveal the real brief
There are a handful of questions that tend to reveal the underlying brief quickly.
Who is your best customer, specifically? Not the addressable market, not the ideal customer profile document. The actual companies that buy, get value, renew, and refer. If you can't describe the characteristics precisely enough to compile a list, the brief is likely to be wrong.
Why do customers choose you over alternatives? Not the differentiation statement from the website. What buyers actually say when asked directly. If the answers are vague, or vary by salesperson, the positioning needs work before anything else does.
What would have to be true for marketing to succeed here? This question brings out the constraints that everyone knows about but nobody has named: a product limitation, a price point that doesn't fit the target segment, a market that isn't ready, a sales motion that doesn't match how buyers actually buy.
What happens when you get the brief right
The right brief changes what you work on. It often means slowing down on execution to do the foundational work first. That's a harder conversation than producing a plan quickly, but it's the more honest one.
Companies that skip this step tend to execute well against the wrong brief. They end up with good content that doesn't convert, well-run campaigns that don't produce pipeline, and a team that's working hard without moving anything forward.
The brief isn't a bureaucratic formality. It's the thing that determines whether everything downstream is worth doing at all. Getting it right at the start is almost always faster than getting it wrong and working out why six months later.
Back to Insights